Mark Ford Mark Ford's Profile Page

Mark Ford Mark Ford

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

CTFL-UT模擬練習、CTFL-UT日本語対策

CertShikenのCTFL-UT問題集を入手してから、非常に短い時間で試験に準備しても、あなたは順調に試験に合格することができます。CertShikenの問題集には、実際の試験に出る可能性がある問題が全部含まれていますから、問題集における問題を覚える限り、簡単に試験に合格することができます。これは試験に合格する最速のショートカットです。仕事に忙しいから試験の準備をする時間はあまりないとしたら、絶対CertShikenのCTFL-UT問題集を見逃すことはできないです。これはあなたがCTFL-UT試験に合格できる最善で、しかも唯一の方法ですから。

ISQI CTFL-UT（ISTQB認定テスターファウンドレベル - ユーザビリティテスト）試験は、ソフトウェアシステムのユーザビリティのテストに焦点を当てた認定プログラムです。この認定は、ユーザビリティテストを専門とし、この分野でのスキルを向上させたい専門家向けに設計されています。この試験では、使いやすさの重要性、使いやすさのテストの原則、ユーザビリティテストのさまざまな方法など、幅広いトピックをカバーしています。

ISQI CTFL-UT（ISTQB認定テスターズベーションレベル - ユーザビリティテスト）認定試験は、ユーザビリティテストにおける個人の知識とスキルを検証するグローバルに認められた認定です。この試験は、製品がユーザーのユーザビリティ要件を満たすことを保証するためのテスターの役割に焦点を当てて、ユーザビリティテストの基本的な概念と原則をカバーするように設計されています。 CTFL-UT認定は、ソフトウェア製品、ウェブサイト、またはモバイルアプリケーションのテストと評価に関与している専門家に最適です。

試験に備えるために、受験者は認定されたトレーニングプロバイダーが提供するトレーニングコースを受講するか、ISTQBシラバスを独学で勉強することができます。試験は複数選択形式で、認定テストセンターでオンラインまたは対面で受験することができます。試験に合格すると、受験者はCTFL-UT認定を受け、ユーザビリティテストの熟練度を証明し、その分野での信頼性を高めることができます。

>> CTFL-UT模擬練習 <<

試験の準備方法-認定するCTFL-UT模擬練習試験-ハイパスレートのCTFL-UT日本語対策

現在の社会で人材があちこちいます。IT領域でも同じです。コンピュータの普及につれて、パソコンを使えない人がほとんどいなくなります。ですから、IT業界で勤めているあなたはプレッシャーを感じていませんか。学歴はどんなに高くてもあなたの実力を代表できません。学歴はただ踏み台だけで、あなたの地位を確保できる礎は実力です。IT職員としているあなたがどうやって自分自身の実力を養うのですか。IT認定試験を受験するのは一つの良い方法です。CTFL-UT試験を通して、あなたは新しいスキルをマスターすることができるだけでなく、CTFL-UT認証資格を取得して自分の高い能力を証明することもできます。最近、ISQI CTFL-UT試験の認証資格がとても人気があるようになりましたが、受験したいですか。

ISQI ISTQB Certified Tester-Foundation Level - Usability Testing 認定 CTFL-UT 試験問題 (Q18-Q23):

質問 # 18
What is a usability test task?

A. A test session in usability testing in which a usability test participant is executing tests, moderated by a moderator and observed by a number of observers
B. A document specifying a sequence of actions for the execution of a usability test. It is used by the moderator to keep track of briefing and pre-session interview questions, usability test tasks, and post- session interview questions
C. A process through which information about the usability of a system is gathered in order to improve the system (known as formative evaluation) or to assess the merit or worth of a system (known as summative evaluation)
D. A usability test execution activity specified by the moderator that needs to be accomplished by a usability test participant within a given period of time

正解：D

解説：
A usability test task is a clearly defined activity that a participant is asked to perform during a usability test session. These tasks are typically created by the test designer or moderator and are designed to reflect realistic user goals (e.g., "Find and buy a product"). The purpose is to observe the participant's interaction with the system and identify usability issues. Option A describes a usability test script, not a task. Option C defines usability evaluation in general, and D refers to a session, not a specific task. Therefore, B is correct.
References:
* ISO 25062:2006 - Common Industry Format (CIF) for Usability Test Reports
* Nielsen Norman Group: Writing Effective Usability Tasks
* Usability.gov: Usability Test Task Design
#######################################################

質問 # 19
Your last 20-pages usability test report wasn't received well by the developers; only two of the 25 usability problems have been fixed. This time, you want to stick to the best practices in order to obtain better acceptance by the development team.
What are you going to do differently this time?

A. Add the low-priority findings you didn't include in the first report
B. Include contact details of the test participants so that the development team can contact them in case they have questions
C. Make the report more detailed and longer
D. Include positive findings in the report, not only usability problems

正解：D

解説：
Usability test reports are more effective when they are balanced and include not only problems but also what worked well. Including positive findings increases credibility, encourages the development team, and helps them understand what should remain unchanged. Option B violates privacy and ethical standards. Option C may dilute focus, and D could worsen the problem by making the report less accessible. Thus, the best practice supported by usability.gov and Nielsen Norman Group is to include both positive and negative findings.
References:
Usability.gov: Reporting Usability Findings
Nielsen Norman Group: Writing Usability Reports that Developers Will Read ISO 25062 - Usability Test Report Format
#######################################################

質問 # 20
What is good accessibility?

A. Good usability of a software product on all devices (smart phone, computer, etc.)
B. Good usability regardless of disturbances like bright sunlight, noise or wind
C. Good usability of a software product by people with limited knowledge of the software
D. Good usability of a software product by people with limited vision, hearing, dexterity, cognition or physical mobility

正解：D

解説：
Accessibility refers to designing products so that people with disabilities or limitations (permanent or temporary) can use them effectively. According to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and ISO standards, accessibility focuses on ensuring that users with vision, hearing, cognitive, or mobility impairments can access digital interfaces. Option D captures this intent accurately. The other options relate to general usability or responsiveness (e.g., device adaptability or user experience in noisy environments) but do not address the inclusive nature of accessibility as defined by official guidelines.
References:
WCAG 2.1 Guidelines - W3C
ISO 9241-171:2008 - Guidance on software accessibility
Usability.gov: Accessibility Basics
#######################################################

質問 # 21
A "usability requirement" is:

A. A requirement how to conduct a usability test
B. A requirement needed for a usability tester
C. A requirement needed to define the size of a mobile phone used in a usability test
D. A requirement on the usability of a component or system

正解：D

解説：
A usability requirement specifies how usable a product or component must be, often in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction, as defined in ISO 9241-11. These requirements ensure that the product meets specific human-centered design goals, such as allowing users to complete tasks accurately and quickly.
Options A and C describe procedural or test setup elements, not actual usability requirements. Option B refers to personnel qualifications, which are not the same as usability requirements related to system behavior or performance.
References:
ISO 9241-11:2018 - Usability: Definitions and Concepts
ISO/IEC 25010:2011 - Product Quality Model (Usability as a quality characteristic) Usability.gov: Defining Usability Requirements
#######################################################

質問 # 22
As an expert for usability, you're in charge of the usability part of the development of a business application for a large customer. You have worked as a usability expert with the development team for two years and are operating well together; the developers value your feedback and give their bests implementing your suggestions. The product is in an early stage, so there's only a rudimentary prototype available.
Given this information, what is the best approach to verify the usability at the current stage?

A. Unmoderated usability test
B. Usability maturity assessment
C. Usability test in the lab
D. Usability review

正解：D

解説：
At an early development stage where only a rudimentary prototype exists, a usability review (e.g., expert or heuristic review) is the most effective method. It allows usability specialists to identify potential usability issues without the need for a fully functioning product. Reviews can provide immediate, actionable feedback to guide design improvements before moving into more resource-intensive usability testing. An unmoderated usability test (B) or lab test (D) may be impractical at this stage due to limited interactivity. A usability maturity assessment (C) evaluates organizational processes and is not applicable to evaluating a specific prototype.
References:
Nielsen Norman Group: When to Use Heuristic Evaluation
ISO 9241-210:2019 - Human-Centered Design Processes
Usability.gov: Usability Evaluation Types

質問 # 23
......

CTFL-UTの実際の試験の品質を確保するために、多くの努力をしました。私たちの会社は何百人もの専門家を雇うことに多額のお金を費やし、彼らは作品を書くためにチームを作りました。これらの専門家の資格は非常に高いです。 CTFL-UT学習ガイドに関する豊富な知識と豊富な経験があります。これらの専門家は、CTFL-UTの学習資料が公式に全員と面談するまでに多くの時間を費やしました。そして、CTFL-UTの実際の試験の内容について科学的な取り決めを行いました。優れたCTFL-UT試験問題でCTFL-UT試験に合格できます。

CTFL-UT日本語対策: https://www.certshiken.com/CTFL-UT-shiken.html

Mark Ford Mark Ford

Biography

Advance your career today!